Friday, June 29, 2007

The Real Divide Between Parties: Nationalist vs Globalist

I'm amazed how most of the Presidential Candidates from both political parties are the same after you peel back the persona they project to rally their respective bases to vote for them. Democrats may openly hate on Bush but advocate aggression (leave all options on the table) towards nations who are not a threat to the United States. What did Kosovo ever do to the United States? Why did Bill Clinton ally himself with the Kosovo Liberation Army or KLA, knowing full well it is a terrorist group? Our government even gave these violent thugs training. If the KLA needed anything they could call Wesley Clark on his mobile phone.

Andrew Longman, accurately points out the real fault line in America:
[T]he 2008 election will be fought out between globalists on one hand (Romney, Giuliani, McCain, Thompson, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Biden and Dodd) and American sovereign parties on the other (Tancredo, Hunter, Paul and Kucinich). It will be a mistake and a mirage for Americans to believe any longer in the Democrat-Republican political theatre, which has been mass packaged by the media for our consumption. These Grammy-winning musicals only exist to play the masses off one another so the globalists, who have dictated the entire top money-tiers of both parties, may forge ahead with their plan to obliterate American sovereignty and crush the peoples beneath their plans for high profits and the global police state. To again gain the privilege of actually having the liberal-conservative contest, populists on both sides must throw out the tops of both parties. What happens in political reality today is a dumb show of convenience, that the puppeteers might install that most beautiful globalist who gets chosen "best actor."

Hope says that real people still vote in the primaries. We, The People, must make a vow not to be influenced by the big-money TV and standard media that seek to install yet another globalist actor candidate. We must hang tough for the real thing. And we must give our money to the Tancredos and the Kuciniches – both of whom are pariahs of their money-elite leadership.

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Illegal Immigration, Slave Economy, Guest Worker Program, Republican and Democrat Politicians: The Immorality Of It All

Slavery was vital to the global economy in the 18th and 19th Centuries:

The vast majority of enslaved Africans employed in plantation agriculture were field hands. Even on plantations, however, they worked in other capacities. Some were domestics and worked as butlers, waiters, maids, seamstresses, and launderers. Others were assigned as carriage drivers, hostlers, and stable boys. Artisans—carpenters, stonemasons, blacksmiths, millers, coopers, spinners, and weavers—were also employed as part of plantation labor forces.

Enslaved Africans also worked in urban areas. Upward of ten percent of the enslaved African population in the United States lived in cities. Charleston, Richmond, Savannah, Mobile, New York, Philadelphia, and New Orleans all had sizable slave populations. In the southern cities they totaled approximately a third of the population.

The range of slave occupations in cities was vast. Domestic servants dominated, but there were carpenters, fishermen, coopers, draymen, sailors, masons, bricklayers, blacksmiths, bakers, tailors, peddlers, painters, and porters. Although most worked directly for their owners, others were hired out to work as skilled laborers on plantations, on public works projects, and in industrial enterprises. A small percentage hired themselves out and paid their owners a percentage of their earnings.

Each plantation economy was part of a larger national and international political economy. The cotton plantation economy, for instance, is generally seen as part of the regional economy of the American South. By the 1830s, "cotton was king" indeed in the South. It was also king in the United States, which was competing for economic leadership in the global political economy. Plantation-grown cotton was the foundation of the antebellum southern economy.

But the American financial and shipping industries were also dependent on slave-produced cotton. So was the British textile industry. Cotton was not shipped directly to Europe from the South. Rather, it was shipped to New York and then transshipped to England and other centers of cotton manufacturing in the United States and Europe.

As the cotton plantation economy expanded throughout the southern region, banks and financial houses in New York supplied the loan capital and/or investment capital to purchase land and slaves.

Recruited as an inexpensive source of labor, enslaved Africans in the United States also became important economic and political capital in the American political economy. Enslaved Africans were legally a form of property—a commodity. Individually and collectively, they were frequently used as collateral in all kinds of business transactions. They were also traded for other kinds of goods and services.

Today the same type of people who practiced slavery want a guest worker program and illegal immigrants. However when they have to pay them minimum wage their support vanishes:
For example, the Florida sugar cane industry began importing Caribbean workers to hand cut cane in 1943 and maintained that cane harvesting could not be mechanized because unique muck soils would bog down machines. But after a lawsuit was filed in the early 1990s alleging that workers guaranteed $5.30 an hour and required to cut one ton of cane per hour should be paid $5.30 a ton, rather than the $3.70 a ton they were paid, cane companies mechanized the harvest within three years.
Politicians like President Bush, Senator John McCain, Senator Ted Kennedy, Senator Lindsay Graham want to continue using poor people from other countries as slaves, wanting to continue the treatment of them as second class citizens. Politicians and Businesses don't care about these human beings. People like Bush, McCain, Fred Thompson, Ted Kennedy should help these people instead of legalizing their exploitation.

This is pathetic:
Affidavits allege that Insolia preferred to hire illegal immigrants because they were desperate for jobs and willing to put up with atrocious working conditions. He even helped them secure forged identity papers, referring them to vendors who would produce the documents for about $120. As for the working conditions, workers were routinely denied overtime pay, docked 15 minutes for every minute late and fined for talking on the job or spending more than two minutes in the plant's "squalid" rest rooms. Sure, but at least the vests and backpacks were made in America!
I would be ashamed if I was one of the Americans eagar to continue this horrid abuse like Bush, McCain and Ted Kennedy.

U.S. Capital Hill Switchboard Number So You can Call your Representatives

Tell your Representatives what you think! Remember they will serve you for a price! The Number is: (202) 224-3121

Lines maybe busy but keep calling!

Senators Blame Talk Radio for the Hostility of Americans Towards Them

Republican Senators are blaming talk radio for the anger and threatening messages (ex. Richard Burr received a message, saying the caller knows where he lives) they are the receiving from their constituents. They are playing the race card, hinting immigration opponents are racist. Many won't openly criticize talk radio out of fear but they share Senator Trent Lott's sentiments. It is clear these Senators are confronting an issue as divisive as its ancestor slavery was.

In their own words:

Senator Lindsay Graham from South Carolina said, “there’s racism in this debate. Nobody likes to talk about it, but a very small percentage of people involved in this debate really have racial and bigoted remarks. The tone that we create around these debates, whether it be rhetoric in a union hall or rhetoric on talk radio, it can take people who are on the fence and push them over emotionally.” Graham said, "we've been down this road before -- 'no Catholics,' 'no Jews,' 'Irish need not apply.'"

Senator Trent Lott from Mississippi said, “talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem.”

Senator Lindsay Graham forgets that most Americans are upset at illegal immigration regardless of the color of the skin the immigrant has. He is as disconnected from morality as were the plantation owners of his home state in the slavery era, using slaves as cheap labor, doing jobs Americans wouldn't do for slave wages. Everyone knows how racist Senator Trent Lott is. I personally wouldn't be surprised if things turned violent like in the old Roman Republic or like the American Civil War between the abolitionist (nativist) and slaveholders (neoslaveholders).

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

President Bush Calls Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill Amnesty

Did President George W. Bush have a freudian slip or was it a simple mistake?

He said:
"You know, I've heard all the rhetoric -- you've heard it, too -- about how this is amnesty. Amnesty means that you've got to pay a price for having been here illegally, and this bill does that."
The Whitehouse is working hard to refute critics of the bill. Bush's slip of the tongue isn't doing him or his fellow ideologues any favors.

Monday, June 25, 2007

Bush Administration and Giuliani Accused of Misleading New Yorkers, Concerning the Health Risk of Being Exposed to the Debris of the Twin Towers

New Yorkers exposed to the debris of the Twin Towers have developed respiratory ailments/lung damage from the dust and may develop cancer from the toxins released. The Bush Administration and Giuliani are implicated in lying to New Yorkers about the Air Quality:
The American College of Preventive Medicine, meanwhile, has expressed fears that deadly, malignant mesothelioma could develop in those exposed. Scores of rescue workers - 40 per cent of whom have no medical insurance - have already developed rare blood-cell cancers and thousands of firefighters have been treated for serious respiratory problems.

"The 9/11 health crisis is an emergency on a national scale, and it requires a federal response," says Carolyn Maloney, Democratic congresswoman from New York, who adds that citizens from all 50 states in the Union as well as foreigners are affected.

The scandal is that the Bush administration knew almost immediately of the dangers of the toxic New York air, but lied. The public could breathe free, secure in the knowledge that "it is not being exposed to excessive levels of asbestos or other harmful substances", according to Christine Todd Whitman, the former New Jersey governor appointed by Bush to lead the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in January 2001. Speaking seven days after the attacks, she said: "I am glad to reassure the people of New York . . . that their air is safe to breathe." The then mayor, Rudy Giuliani, chimed in to say that air quality was "safe and acceptable". Both Whitman and Giuliani, subsequent investigations suggest, were under pressure from the White House to provide these reassurances in order to keep Wall Street operating.

In the words of O'Clery, "we were systematically misled". Dr Cate Jenkins, a senior EPA scientist who has kept her job despite accusing Whitman and others of lying, says the EPA knew all along that the air hundreds of thousands were breathing was potentially as "caustic and corrosive as Drano", the best-known American drain declogger.

Dr Marjorie Clarke - an environmental scientist at the City University of New York - like-wise contradicted the Bush administration when she warned a Senate committee that, far from it being the case that the air in New York was safe to breathe, the attacks had "produced uncontrolled emissions equivalent to dozens of asbestos factories, incinerators and crematoria, as well as a volcano". These "created an unpre cedented quantity and combination of dozens of toxic and carcinogenic substances" and were "dispersed over a large area for several months", including parts of New Jersey. "US Geological Survey aerial maps in late September 2001," she found, "show asbestos contamination in Manhattan miles from the WTC."

Christine Whitman, the former EPA Chief was questioned by Congress. Whitman tried to deflect attacks, claiming the terrorist should be blamed and not the Government, but Democrat Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York pointed out that she was a liar.

Most US Presidential Hopefuls Lack Military Experience

Only Duncan Hunter and John McCain have combat experience. Jim Gilmore served in West Germany, Ron Paul was a flight surgeon, Chris Dodds and Tommy Thompson were in Army Reserve. Unless we elect someone like Ron Paul we may very well have another incompetent fool in the White House, trying to police the world unless Pro-war Conservatives start supporting Duncan Hunter or find one of those Four Star Generals who rejected Bush's overtures to be his War Czar. Do we really need more posturing with no substance?

Marine Gen. John J. "Jack" Sheehan, former Supreme Allied Commander, NATO Commander-in-Chief, and U.S. Atlantic Command. A highly decorated warrior:
His decorations and medals include: the Defense Distinguished Service Medal; Silver Star Medal; Defense Superior Service Medal; Bronze Star Medal with Combat “V” and gold star in lieu of a second award; Purple Heart with gold star; the Defense Meritorious Service Medal; Meritorious Service Medal; Army Commendation Medal; Navy Achievement Medal; Combat Action Ribbon; Presidential Unit Citation; Navy Unit Commendation; National Defense Service Medal with one bronze star; Vietnam Service Medal; Southwest Asia Service Medal with two bronze stars; Republic of Vietnam Cross of Gallantry with silver star; and the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces Honor (First Class).
He said, "[t]he very fundamental issue is, they don't know where the hell they're going, so rather than go over there, develop an ulcer and eventually leave, I said, 'No, thanks,' ", believing Cheney and the Neocons are more powerful in the White House than pragmatist trying to find a way out of Iraq.

It is telling when someone as decorated and knowledgeable as Marine Gen. John J. "Jack" Sheehan rejects a position offered by the President of the United States because there is a lack of intelligent thought in the Executive Branch. We need someone like him as President if we are to continue our present foreign policy.

Vice President Richard Cheney's Take on Presidential Authority.

Richard Cheney believes that it is the Presidents prerogative to decide how war is conducted without any restraints from National Laws or Treaties such as the Geneva convention. Human Rights groups took Cheney to task when he said in an interview that "a dunk in the water" for terrorism suspects during questioning in order to save American lives was a "no-brainer". President Bush and Cheney defended themselves saying that the US doesn't commit torture and that he wasn't advocating torture.

George W. Bush and Richard Cheney subscribe to the Unitary Executive Theory. They have been able to expand the Executive Branch's power, virtually ending the Posse Comitatus Act, so the President can control and use the United States Military against Americans in the United States as he or she sees fit. Governors are fighting back hard to regain the exclusive power of controlling the National Guard in their home states.